Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] argumentation
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Jul 5 12:05:53 2006
References: <B3A67BD0-BF50-4AA0-91D9-FC68A6573F83@wanadoo.fr>

Better :-)
Thanks for showing,
Philippe



Op 4-jul-06, om 23:49 heeft f berton het volgende geschreven:

> Thanks.. I made a new scan... (from negative)
>
> http://perso.orange.fr/photos.francois.b/p-images.htm
>
>>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 19:58:59 +0200
>> From: Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] argumentation
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Message-ID: <277081D3-1402-4B53-A0C4-058984F67C43@pandora.be>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=US-ASCII;       delsp=yes;      
>> format=flowed
>>
>> How did you treat this image? Is it a scan from a print on
>> watercolour paper?
>> There seems to be a kind of structure which I find disturbing in an
>> online image.
>> Without it, I think your photograph would be stronger.
>> Thanks for showing,
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 4-jul-06, om 08:04 heeft f berton het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>
>>> argumentation...
>>> http://perso.orange.fr/photos.francois.b/p-images.htm
>>>
>>> thanks for looking
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from f.berton at wanadoo.fr (f berton) ([Leica] argumentation)