Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lordy, Lordy... guilty on at least 4 out of 12. I throw myself on the mercy of the court. :-)) >On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:09 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > >>Lottermoser George writes in part: >> >>>In an attempt to help us all avoid creating and posting "mediocre" >>>photographs; can we develop a group consensus on what constitutes a >>>mediocre photograph? (sometimes we post images which are simply >>>interesting visual notes of situations and I believe not intended >>>to be seen as anything more - I'm not dicussing about those). >>> >> >>LOL!! >> >>After we agree on what makes a great photo (might take the Lug >>collective a day or so) we can then solve that problem of some art >>being mediocre art and then move on to deciding which political >>philosopy we should ascribe to! >> >>On the other hand, never mind... I don't think it can be done. >> >>Regards, >> >>Greg >> > >For a start - > >Pictures of: > >Cute kids doing cute things. >Kittens, no matter how cute. >Landscapes without clouds. >Anything taken with a 15 mm lens. >Car racing scenes without cars. >Cars racing without crashes. >Any picture of New York crowds. >Family celebrations where everyone is looking at the camera. >Flowers, flowers, flowers. >Seascapes. >Photos including the photographer's feet. >Most of my pictures of any topic. > >Larry Z > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Regards, Dick