Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Mediocre photographs
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Thu Jun 29 17:44:03 2006
References: <200606292209.k5TM96Go063985@server1.waverley.reid.org> <5a40a883ab71cbd2ec0e086a70956358@optonline.net>

Lordy, Lordy...  guilty on at least 4 out of 12.  I throw myself on 
the mercy of the court.  :-))


>On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:09 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:
>
>>Lottermoser George writes in part:
>>
>>>In an attempt to help us all avoid creating and posting "mediocre"
>>>photographs; can we develop a group consensus on what constitutes a
>>>mediocre photograph? (sometimes we post images which are simply
>>>interesting visual notes of situations and I believe not intended
>>>to be seen as anything more - I'm not dicussing about those).
>>>
>>
>>LOL!!
>>
>>After we agree on what makes a great photo (might take the Lug 
>>collective a day or so) we can then solve that problem of some art 
>>being mediocre art and then move on to deciding which political 
>>philosopy we should ascribe to!
>>
>>On the other hand, never mind... I don't think it can be done.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Greg
>>
>
>For a start -
>
>Pictures of:
>
>Cute kids doing cute things.
>Kittens, no matter how cute.
>Landscapes without clouds.
>Anything taken with a 15 mm lens.
>Car racing scenes without cars.
>Cars racing without crashes.
>Any picture of New York crowds.
>Family celebrations where everyone is looking at the camera.
>Flowers, flowers, flowers.
>Seascapes.
>Photos including the photographer's feet.
>Most of my pictures of any topic.
>
>Larry Z
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick

In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Mediocre photographs)