Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: Re: 4/3 question (B. D. Colen)
From: nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts)
Date: Mon Jun 19 16:54:58 2006

All I would say is that dust on the sensor is MUCH less of a problem than 
dust on negs, it really is.
 
Nick

----- Original Message ----
From: G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au>
To: lug@leica-users.org
Sent: Tuesday, 20 June, 2006 12:39:22 AM
Subject: [Leica] RE: Re: 4/3 question (B. D. Colen)


B.D. 
The sensor dust issue evidently is one that requires consideration with
DSLRs. 
There's another option that some LUG members take.
You can use a 21MP analog, non-crop factored, non-proprietary renewable
sensor surface and blow the dust off before you scan ;-)

I think that Olympus should best be remembered for birthing the OM cameras,
for their innovation, form factor, OTF metering, bright finders etc etc

Recidivist Hoppy

My 2.7 c worth at today's exchange rate.

Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: 4/3 question (B. D. Colen))
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] RE: Re: 4/3 question (B. D. Colen))