Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Daniel, I think that you have demonstrated some of the strengths of the lens design with clarity, absence of flare and veiling glare in these fine backlit images. Exactly the properties that have entranced me as I learn to use my 90. http://gallery.leica-users.org/analog-images/Velvia_Mina I also agree with your assessment on the close up performance. Not a lot going wrong shooting at f4 either! (Another compelling Leica glass argument) I bet those images look fantastic printed at their full quality. You've inspired me to try some B/W portraits next. Go the LNUG Cheers Hoppy > Message: 4 Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:06:29 +0200 From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Re: [Leica] PAW 24 dlridings To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Message-ID: <a2f8f4470606182306xa57536r8026de727d164e7d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed LNUG = "Leica Nut's ..." :-) I wanted to try the Tele-Elmarit out in demanding situations. In almost all of these I was putting the sun behind them, strong back lighting. I figured if it was going to flare or lose contrast, that would do it. But it held up. http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0005.jpg.html http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0006.jpg.html http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0007.jpg.html In the last one I wanted to see if its reputed lack of sharpness at closest distances was anything I would ever notice. All of these are only stopped down to f4 and I have another one wide open at 2.8. For my part, the lack of sharpness at close range is theoretical. Thanks, Daniel On 6/19/06, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > Daniel the shot of the young lady (your daughter?)with the pasta dish has > wonderful light for her complexion and hair. And of course Leica clarity. > I'm thinking that there should be a sub-set of the LUG, being LNUG. > Go the nineties! > > Cheers > Hoppy > Elmarit M 90 > > ------------------------------ >