Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 4/3 question
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Mon Jun 19 13:57:07 2006
References: <061920061928.11103.4496FAC30004682E00002B5F2200761438040C02019C990E04@comcast.net> <C0BC7440.1222E%bdcolen@comcast.net>

But haven't they already? Isn't this one of the technologies they
licensed to Panasonic for the upcoming 4/3rds camera?

AB


On 6/19/06, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote:
> If Olympus was really smart, they'd license it out to anyone with the 
> bucks.
>
>
> On 6/19/06 3:28 PM, "mcyclwritr@comcast.net" <mcyclwritr@comcast.net> 
> wrote:
>
> > It may not be a reason to buy into another camera system, but if Canon 
> > offered
> > an EOS 5D ASC (Automatic Sensor Cleaning), I'd pay a couple hundred 
> > extra for
> > it, assuming it really worked.
> >
> > -Chris Lawson
> >
> >
> >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@comcast.net>
> >> You miss the point...I'm not endorsing anything, nor am I suggesting 
> >> it's a
> >> reason to buy the equipment. All I'm saying is that it's a real bit of
> >> innovation - one that Panasonic has already licensed, and Leica will 
> >> too if
> >> it's smart, and if Olympus wants to license it.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/19/06 2:23 PM, "Philippe Orlent" <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> You should start signing with 'endorsement by B.D. Colen' ;-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Op 19-jun-06, om 20:05 heeft B. D. Colen het volgende geschreven:
> >>>
> >>>> When all is said and done, Olympus will probably be remembered for one
> >>>> contribution to the digital revolution, and that is the self-cleaning
> >>>> sensor; it really, really works. I don't pay any more attention to
> >>>> where I
> >>>> put my digital bodies, where I change lenses, or in any way baby
> >>>> them any
> >>>> more than I did my Ms or film Nikons. And in all the time I've now
> >>>> been
> >>>> using the E-1, I have had a total of one image which has a sensor
> >>>> dust spot
> >>>> on it. I didn't clean the sensor after that, because the next time
> >>>> I turned
> >>>> the camera on, the spot disappeared.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/19/06 12:36 PM, "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I've had it happen, no doubt about that, but not nearly as much as I
> >>>>> feared. That is all I was saying.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I did notice it the first time when I was at the coast with a vast
> >>>>> section of the photography monotonic ... sea and sky went together.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am fairly paranoid about how I handle the camera. When not in
> >>>>> use, I
> >>>>> keep it in a plastic bag, not a dusty Domke. It's being used most of
> >>>>> the time though, so it is out in the open a lot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So far I've been able to blow the dust off. I dread the day when the
> >>>>> build up of static electricity makes that impossible.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Daniel
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 6/19/06, Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Daniel and Jayanand - I believe that if either one of you actually
> >>>>>> photograph a cloudless sky or blank piece of paper (to medium gray)
> >>>>>> you will see the evidence of dust on your sensors. Give it a try and
> >>>>>> let me know. It's a very real issue with medium gray areas without
> >>>>>> detail. Sometimes you have to blow up the image a bit to see the
> >>>>>> effects.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> George Lottermoser
> >>>>>> george@imagist.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jun 18, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It is a wee bit over exaggerated, Jayanand, but it exists. It
> >>>>>>> happened
> >>>>>>> to me once with my D100, but it came off easily with a standard
> >>>>>>> rubber-bulb blower.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 6/18/06, Jayanand Govindaraj <jgovindaraj@eth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> I have the Nikon D70, live in an atrociously dusty environment,
> >>>>>>>> change
> >>>>>>>> lenses quite frequently, and I have not had to clean the sensor
> >>>>>>>> either!!
> >>>>>>>> I think this problem is a wee bit overdone.
> >>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>> Jayanand
> >>>>>>>> Chennai, India
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] 4/3 question)
In reply to: Message from mcyclwritr at comcast.net (mcyclwritr@comcast.net) ([Leica] 4/3 question)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] 4/3 question)