Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 90mm's
From: leica at (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Tue Jun 6 04:06:08 2006
References: <>

By all accounts there was never a single day in Capa's career when he 
could have AFFORDED a shi*load of redundant lenses.  He would 
therefore not have known if there might be some significant advantage 
to having them.  Carry on with the collecting; if nothing else you'll 
have an extremely intriguing assortment of paperweights one day.

On 5 Jun 2006 at 21:07, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> Ouch!
> On Behalf Of Robert
> Schneider
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:02 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 90mm's
> He also never said, "If your pictures aren't good enough, you need a  
> shi*load of redundant lenses."
> On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> > Capa never said "If your pictures aren't good enough, you need a 90."
> >

R. Clayton McKee                 
P O Box 571900                           voice/fax   713/783-3502
Houston, TX 77257-1900                   cell phone #  on request

Replies: Reply from kididdoc at (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re: 90mm's)
In reply to: Message from schneiderpix at (Robert Schneider) ([Leica] Re: 90mm's)
Message from jsmith342 at (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re: 90mm's)