Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 90mm's
From: bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Mon Jun 5 19:31:59 2006

And once again, Jeffrey, we finally get to the heart of the matter...."I'm
really most comfortable with a..." That's what it's all about. If it works
for you, that's what you go with. :-)


On 6/5/06 10:25 PM, "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:

> I'm really most comfortable with 50, so I'm a very, very "normal" guy. But
> the guys getting the nicely cropped head shots are using longer stuff.
> Handheld, 90 is really my limit without flash.
> 
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Marc
> James Small
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:13 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: 90mm's
> 
> 
> At 08:57 PM 6/5/06 -0500, you wrote:
>> Capa never said "If your pictures aren't good enough, you need a 90."
>> 
>> Jeffery Smith
>> New Orleans, LA
>> http://www.400tx.com
> 
> Jeffery
> 
> We have never met in person but, trust me, I love you like a brother and I
> look forward to the time when we meet in person.
> 
> A 90mm lens is a wide-standard.  A 40cm lens is a normal lens.  Stay away
> from the folks and let them live their lives.
> 
> The next time some jerk photojournalist shoulders his way into my face to
> take his pictures, he really will get an elbow in his jaws.  You wide-angle
> folks do not understand how threatening you seem to those of us who are 
> your
> targets.
> 
> Capa's comment was cool for the time but was also full of BS -- President
> Truman, for instance, directed that no one at a Presidential Press
> Conference use a lens less that 50mm.
> 
> Me?  Now that I am retired, I do not expect to EVER appear again at a 
> public
> function.  But I have done so on frequent occasion over the past quarter of
> a century, and I have always told the Photo-Toads that I wanted a 12 foot
> (3m) circle of safety and that I'd clobber them if they came closer than
> that.  They knew that I meant what I said, and I generally had some hefty
> friends along to emphasize the point.
> 
> You wide-angle guys are simply sick.  Get back to a decent distance, let 
> the
> subject be okay, and shoot the picture with a 40cm Telyt.
> 
> What YOU guys wish to do is to jam the camera into the jaws of the victim
> and get a horrified response.  Jam a camera in my face, and you will get a
> horrified response, which will include the destruction of your camera.
> 
> Wide Angle Dudes.  Stay away.  Learn long lenses.  Understand that Duncan
> and Capa were speaking for what scientists call "special circumstances".
> 
> I detest wide-angle lenses as they defy the very reason for photograhy  --
> documentig reality.  Still, that 4.5/21 CZ Biogon did a hell of a hit at 
> the
> Bridge at Mull in Ireland back in 2001.
> 
> Marc
> 
> msmall@aya.yale.edu
> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re: 90mm's)