Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 777
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Mon Jun 5 07:56:48 2006
References: <000a01c68826$31aec570$71340b44@newukolbqveo9i> <01f301c688b6$a4e6eaa0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>

That must be why one must do all there agitation on their knees while 
processing in777?

Christopher Williams wrote:

>Is this the godly version of the 666 developer?
>
>Chris
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jeffery Smith" Subject: [Leica] 777
>
>
>  
>
>>Well, my bags of 777 developer are sitting ready to go. I have had
>>difficulty finding much information on this developer other than all of
>>    
>>
>the
>  
>
>>caveats (it smells, it turns sludgy, the funkier it gets, the better it
>>works, etc.).
>>
>>Do any of you have any practical experience with this developer? I keep
>>reading that "agitation is critical", but then nother is mentioned about
>>just WHAT you have to do carefully when agitating.
>>
>>Jeffery Smith
>>New Orleans, LA
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re: 777)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 777)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: 777)