Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital M Principle
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat Jun 3 14:17:37 2006

Uh oh! How about a dork with a bag full of 50's? ;-)

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Walt
Johnson
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:07 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital M Principle


Holy Haysus B.D.

I'm on a roll now and have to add my 24.5 cents......A shooter with a 
beat-up Pentax is still a shooter. A dork with a bag full of expensive 
cameras is still a dork. It would be interesting to test this theory out 
in the real world, wouldn't it?

Walt

B. D. Colen wrote:

>I was simply making the point that we now know less than nothing about
>digital M image quality, as there is as yet not digital M. So we have 
>absolutely no way to know that it will produce better images than a D70. It

>may, of course. And God knows that at more than 5 times the price of a D70 
>it better. But given that the person making the statement loves to accuse 
>me of making statements based on speculation... :-).
>
>
>...... Original Message .......
>On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 15:26:52 -0500 "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342@cox.net> 
>wrote:
>  
>
>>Well, I suppose because rf lenses are less of a challenge to design 
>>because you don't have that big mirror box between the lens and the 
>>sensor. But the angle of the light striking the sensor then becomes 
>>more of a problem.
>>
>>Jeffery Smith
>>New Orleans, LA
>>http://www.400tx.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>>[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of B. 
>>D. Colen
>>Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 3:04 PM
>>To: Leica Users Group
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital M Principle
>>
>>
>>To use a rangefinder? Of course. Better image quality? Based on what 
>>facts?
>>
>>
>>...... Original Message .......
>>On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 10:17:09 -0700 Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> 
>>wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Jun 3, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Afterswift@aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>... producing a digital M using anything but a true 24x36mm
>>>>revolutionary sensor would be a huge mistake. Why would I switch from 
>>>>the Nikon D70 to a digital M in that case?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>1) to use a rangefinder instead of an SLR
>>>2) better image quality
>>>
>>>Doug Herr
>>>Birdman of Sacramento
>>>http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>      
>>>
>>___
>>Sent from handheld device. Please forgive any typos or spelling 
>>errors.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>___
>Sent from handheld device. Please forgive any typos or spelling errors.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Digital M Principle)
In reply to: Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Digital M Principle)