Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry, Jeffrey, you're just going to have to buy another 50. Neither of these is a Jupiter. Nick ----- Original Message ---- From: Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> Cc: Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 23 May, 2006 3:54:52 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Jupiter lens ID I was hoping that one was a Jupiter. Does the Jupiter have an obvious insignia on it? -- Jeffery ---- Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: > Jeffery, > > Those are both Industars, not Jupiters. I think the only Jupiter that > is 2.8 is the 35mm Jupiter-12. > > You'll probably see a "61" or another 2 digit number. > > Daniel > > > On 5/23/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote: > > Can someone tell me how I might go about identifying an LTM Jupiter > > lens? I have one 2,8/55 and one 2,8/53 that have different markings but > > look very similar in profile. The 2,8/55 has a logo on the front that > > looks like a bi-convex lens element on top of a bi-concave lens element. > > -- > > Jeffery > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information