Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I keep pondering this scanning thing and frankly I'm not sure that doing anything more than just getting the bits into the computer matters a great deal - VueScan or Nikon or SilverFast - they get the basics into the computer. IF these programs could dynamically change the way the image is scanned so some segments could be sampled more or it would be possible to change the sensitivity of the sensors in some way, then I'd think the software mattered. But that doesn't happen. So why use the scanner software at all and just do it in a tool designed for pixel manipulation: Photoshop? Yes, you can adjust the input curves in your scanning software, but that's no different than adjusting the curves in Photoshop. So lots of time spent scanning seems wasted - get the pixels in and then deal with them in Photoshop. I'm totally willing to be convinced this is wrong-thinking but you're going to have to demonstrate why this is the case. Adam