Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?
From: langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer)
Date: Thu May 11 08:26:23 2006
References: <9310466.1147353946540.JavaMail.root@centrmwml03.mgt.cox.net> <ceb1a5650605110815j3541eea3sf0e275174e5a8e20@mail.gmail.com> <C1DF70EB-B1F0-4B78-BD88-AB15C517EBFD@cox.net>

I have another naieve question -- what constitutes the "best"?  It seems to
me that there is no one "best" lens unless you make clear the criteria that
one uses to determine what "best" means.  Value for money?  Sheer optical
performance?  Do compactness, balance when mounted on the camera, speed,
ability to mount on both a screwmount and bayonet body, etc. matter in this
evaluation?  Depending on the criteria, I could opt for any one of a number
of lenses to suggest, even with the limitation of only speaking of ones I
have used personally.

Mark

On 5/11/06, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Mark Langer wrote:
>
> > How can people say that this lens is the best when it isn't even
> > available
> > yet?
>
>
> easy Mark... the same way they can compare two lenses that they have
> never used, and with absolute authority select the best...
>
> :-)
>
> Steve
>
> >
> > Enquiring minds want to know.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On 5/11/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Daniel, I put a down payment of $100 on that new Heliar two months
> >> ago.
> >> I'm hoping that my serial number will be 0000003.
> >> --
> >> Jeffery
> >>
> >> ---- Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On 5/11/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
> >> > > Now, this  isn't a "What should I buy?" question because I
> >> have nearly
> >> all
> >> > > of them already.
> >> >
> >> > Ahem ...
> >> > http://www.cameraquest.com/inventor.htm
> >> >
> >> > scroll down to the 50/2.0 Heliar. You're going to need that one
> >> and you
> >> know it.
> >> >
> >> > > I have a pretty good idea of what most folks would say, but
> >> wondered
> >> if I am
> >> > > right. If the Department of Homeland Security dictated that a
> >> photographer
> >> > > could have only one lens, a 50 (so you couldn't take pictures of
> >> places you
> >> > > planned to attack), what would it be? Oh, and it has to be Leica.
> >> >
> >> > Since it would be very difficult and time consuming to really
> >> take all
> >> > of the variables into consideration and give them correct
> >> answers ...
> >> > I'd get boring on you and opt out with ...
> >> >
> >> > Summicron
> >> >
> >> > You really can't go wrong with a Summicron. I'd never have to look
> >> > back and wonder if I made the right choice.
> >> >
> >> > Daniel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Leica Users Group.
> >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> >> information
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)