Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Wed May 10 19:10:14 2006

If you are a disciple of the Photodo ratings, the Photodo ratings of the
Noctilux are way up there (4.2), and despite what others may say, I've never
found a highly-rated Photodo lens that was bad. They may have some low-rated
lenses that are striking, though.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Ken
Iisaka
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:54 PM
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?


Sure, Noctilux is designed to perform well under very limited lighting, but
it performs superbly in a less rigorous condition.  There is hardly anything
that a Noctilux do cannot but only a Summilux or Summicron can besides
close-ups at less than 1 metre.

For me, Noctilux is the one and the only lens which would have to be pried
off my cold dead hand.  Sure, it's bigger than other Leica lenses, but the
combination with the body still weighs less than many digital SLR bodies.
Besides, one Noctilux is cheaper than a Noctilux and a Summicron.


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+ken=iisaka.org@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+ken=iisaka.org@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jeffery
Smith
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:02 PM
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?

Now, this  isn't a "What should I buy?" question because I have nearly all
of them already. And the Noctilux 50/1.0 isn't the right answer because it
is really designed to be used under limited light and it is just too darned
big, expensive, and heavy to be a "best" of all worlds. Take into account:

Sharpness (a subjective perception)
Contrast
Bokeh
Easy of use (yeah, I guess that means weight and size)
Contrast
Versatility
Affordability (keep in mind that I'm talking to LUGers who could afford the
body...they have enough to buy this lens, but who spend $3,800 if you can
buy the best all-around 50 for less?) Use with today's films, not classic
films Intangibles

I have a pretty good idea of what most folks would say, but wondered if I am
right. If the Department of Homeland Security dictated that a photographer
could have only one lens, a 50 (so you couldn't take pictures of places you
planned to attack), what would it be? Oh, and it has to be Leica.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com





_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
In reply to: Message from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)