Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 75-90mm lenses - Opinions
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue May 9 16:12:18 2006

You used the right word here, Joseph. I had completely overlooked that
option. And I think that a relatively fast 75/2 might be the best complement
to my 90/2.8 Hexanon. Thanks for the reminder!

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Yao
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:56 PM
To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] 75-90mm lenses - Opinions


Jeffery,

Do not over look the Leica APO Summicron M 75/2.0 ASPH.

If the Hexanon 90/2.8 and Heliar 75/2.5 are 'very good', I would rate the
Elmarit M 90/2.8 as 'excellent', and the APO Summicron M 75/2.0 ASPH
'stunning'.  And by Leica standard, it is not too unreasonable at under
US$2,000.  It is also a relatively compact lens, much smaller than, say, the
Summilux 75/1.4 and 90/2.0.

Bests,

Joseph


On 9/5/06 8:47 am, "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:

> I have every conceivable possible lens between 15mm and 50mm (with a 
> lot of weight skewed toward the 50mm end). However, I have only two 
> lenses past 50...a 90/2.8 Hexanon (which is "very good") and a 75/2.5 
> Heliar (which is "very good"). I would like to have something 
> excellent longer than 50. It's a length I don't use enough. Since 
> Zeiss Ikon apparently stopped dead in their tracks at 50, I pretty 
> much have the following choices in Leica glass:
> 
> 75/1.4
> 90/4
> 90/2.8
> 90/2
> 
> Of course, the faster the glass, the more expensive it is. I doubt 
> that I will be shooting smoky, dimly-lit pubs with this. So speed is 
> not that much of an object. Does one of these stand out among the 
> others? If the fast glass is the glass with hair-raising quality, I 
> will consider [choke!] the cost as secondary.
> 
> BTW, 90mm seems to be the length LEAST used by LUGers, at least in PAW 
> postings. It isn't THAT long......
> 
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from joseph at yao.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] 75-90mm lenses - Opinions)