Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Tmax 400 in Tmax dev or HC110
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sun May 7 20:50:45 2006
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060507163918.02d8ea20@mail.rhtc.net> <C083D444.1047C%bdcolen@comcast.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20060507191002.02bbed40@mail.rhtc.net> <445EA0C1.1030600@waltjohnson.com> <12DE8B42-4E48-4614-ADD2-C51B61577BF9@comcast.net>

On 5/8/06, Ernest Nitka <enitka1@comcast.net> wrote:
> I have seen too many scratches on my HP5+ but not on my TriX.  I
> really don't want the grain of TriX

I really don't get it. Tri-X is one of Kodak's fine-grained films. I
think its reputation for being grainy comes from the 50'ies or 60'ies,
but it's probably time we realize that it ain't so anymore.

> so am
> thinking of changing to Tmax - does anyone have experience using
> HC110 with this film.

Little lower exposure index (tad less than 400 will do it). But it is
grainier than the new Tri-X. It used to be Kodak's fine-grained 400
film, but the new Tri-X passed it up.

Nice film though. It handles underexposure nicely, probably better than 
Tri-X.

Daniel


In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) (The state of PJ Today - was: BD's Re: [Leica] So for... -)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) (The state of PJ Today - was: BD's Re: [Leica] So for... -)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) (The state of PJ Today - was: BD's Re: [Leica] So for... -)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) (The state of PJ Today - was: BD's Re: [Leica] So for... -)
Message from enitka1 at comcast.net (Ernest Nitka) ([Leica] Tmax 400 in Tmax dev or HC110)