Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is exactly what confused me--I checked the serial no. on Leica's web site and it came up with a Ig. Thanks to everyone for correcting me. Nathan Douglas Sharp wrote: > In fact a very late IIIg, which for some unknown reason has the serial > no. of a Ig from 1957 > Douglas > > Kenneth Frazier wrote: > >> >> On May 6, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: >> >>> Pictures of all the above can be seen here: >>> http://wajsman.smugmug.com/gallery/1431737 >> >> >> Nice looking stuff, and I think Richard is right. That's a IIIg. >> >> Ken >> ----------------------------------- >> The Rev. Kenneth Frazier >> Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ >> ---------------------------------- >> Current Leica Photography (PESO): >> http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r >> >> Current Medium Format Photos: >> http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS! General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507 Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog