Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Apr 23 11:46:16 2006
References: <9b678e0604231126s70da9a80r3b13e10053444db2@mail.gmail.com> <002a01c66704$fd7d8670$8d6b4f51@GeeBee>

Graham,
Thank you.  Yes, my PS skills were no match for a few oof branches I
removed; probably too soft a clone stamp setting.  The healing brush didn't
work so I was reduced to nibbling out pixels which can be problematic.  In
hindsight I probably should have left the branches in.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 4/23/06, GeeBee <graham@geebeespaw.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com>
>
> Subject: [Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence
>
>
> I was out with the 75 Summilux trying to do people pictures but ended up
> with this:
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/album337/leafskyline
>
> Neopan 400 no filters M6
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Don,
>
> I really like that! I am well acquainted with the theory that there is
> nothing new under the sun but I don't recall ever seeing anything like
> that.
> If I have, it obviously wasn't done as well or it would have registered.
>
> My only nit pick is that it looks like a bit of cloning or somesuch has
> been
> done top right and could use a little more work to hide it but it cannot
> negate the wow! factor that I got on first viewing.
>
> --Graham
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence)
Message from graham at geebeespaw.freeserve.co.uk (GeeBee) ([Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence)