Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] WAS: enough with Olympus NOW HCB
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Wed Mar 22 08:15:55 2006
References: <C045D418.E3A3%bdcolen@comcast.net> <e6cc7316df34cc5eeb2d9d570a8481ff@paulhardycarter.com> <5400-SnapperMsg4EA12C31C0470073@[70.194.119.245]>
B.D.
Are you robbing Peter to pay Paul? Who among us is so perfect as to not
be called into question? He was a great shooter, a great war photog and
probably a hell of a lot of fun. ( I envy him nailing Ingrid) Now what
the hell has any of that to do with the veracity of the /*falling soldier*/?
Walt
B. D. Colen wrote:
> I think that that body of work, and the risks he
>routinely took, which ultimately cost his life, are as close as we will
>ever come to "proof" that the photo is real.
>
>
>
Replies:
Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] WAS: enough with Olympus NOW HCB)
In reply to:
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] WAS: enough with Olympus NOW HCB)
Message from paul at paulhardycarter.com (PHC) ([Leica] WAS: enough with Olympus NOW HCB)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] WAS: enough with Olympus NOW HCB)