Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Spooky church
From: rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra)
Date: Thu Mar 2 18:54:06 2006
References: <201.11de9948.31390833@aol.com>

I'll have to check my palm.  I'm not dead yet, so it aint quite 18%  
grey.  Sonny, maybe you've still got a layer of that Katrina goop on  
your hands????  :-D

Rick.


On 03/03/2006, at 1:47 PM, SonC@aol.com wrote:

>
>
> In a message dated 3/2/2006 8:40:01 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> rdcb37@dodo.com.au writes:
>
> Adam,  the 'problem' with this image came from using the internal
> metering  with an M6.  Clearly the lens sucks in light from all over
> the  place and its very difficult to get an accurate reading from a
> balanced part of the scene.  I don't have an incident meter  (should
> get one I think) so these days I either go by dead  reckoning, or put
> on a 50 or 90 and meter with that.  I've even  carried a second body
> with a 50 Summicron just to do metering for my  21
>
>
> -----------------
>
> With my 21, in situations like that, I simply meter off my palm. It  
> becomes
> a miniature model of the subject, (when the lighting is similar.)   
> That's
> exactly what a incident meter does.
>
> Another trick I was reminded of by Tina some time ago; take your  
> reading  off
> grass, if there is any available.  It is close to a gray card in   
> reflectance.
>
>
> Regards,
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
> ?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Spooky church)