Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Portable tripods Suggestions - Bogen Manfrotto prefered
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Fri Feb 17 06:54:20 2006
References: <43F2C953.2070808@adrenaline.com> <p06230901c0196db6819a@[10.4.1.157]>

There's a cool new Gitzo portable CF tripod where the center column
sort of "flips over" somehow to eliminate the folded extra length
added by the tripod head. But IIRC, it's > $600.

But for various personal reasons, I've just got to keep my spendy habbits
in check for a while :-)  or is that :-(

Just need something small and light that will allow me to shoot some
slow films without bright daylight.  I've got a nice pair of M6TTL's,
a RRS Arca Swiss style plate, a nice sturdy Linhof cable release, a set
of Leica lenses (current 28/50/90) that that surpass my abilities to make
full use of them, and a good chunk of Delta 100 in the freezer and access
to some of the slower Efke emulsions.

Now I've just got to put it all together with a portable tripod, and do
so with some exercise of home economics.

Someone pointed out a Chinese (gasp!) CF tripod that seems like a Gitzo
clone - the Feisol CT-3301N.  Even lighter than some of the Bogen models
I've considered, something around $250 for the legs, and Googling around,
owners seem to like theirs.

I'll keep researching and shopping for a while.

Scott

Henning Wulff wrote:

>
> I've had a number of Manfrotto tripods as well as Gitzo, and in my 
> opinion the Gitzos are worth every penny. They have proven themselves 
> to be much more durable, and off more real stability for considerably 
> less weight. I currently use two Gitzo CF tripods (as well as some 
> aluminum  ones): a 1028 and a 1228. The 1028, which weighs about 
> 750gms, is completely sufficient for Leica M useage as long as there 
> is no wind. It's about 138cm high when extended, which is a bit short 
> but generally fine for travel.
>
> If I got one tripod now for travel, etc. and money wasn't an issue, I 
> would get a G1158T, which goes up to 149cm and folds down to about 
> 41cm, and weighs just under 1kg. It's good for any M with any lens. If 
> I wanted to save some money, I would get the G1197 Basalt, which is 
> considerably cheaper and weighs 1.2kg and doesn't fold to quite as 
> compact a bundle. I would take this over either the MF3 or MF4 
> Bogen/Manfrotto tripods any day, and the price is in the same range.
>
> Note that carbon fiber or basalt tripods absorb vibrations a lot more 
> than aluminum tripods, so if the load capacity is adequate (and it 
> usually is) then you can often go down one size and get the same 
> performance.
>
> For medium/small tripods I've found Cullman ballheads to give the best 
> performance/weight ration, and the two that I use on the carbon 
> Gitzo's are extremely smooth. Something like the 904 Cullman (230gm) 
> is completely adequate for the 1 series Gitzo tripods. You can add a 
> small Bogen/Manfrotto quick release such as the 3299 system which is 
> completely adequate. I use the 394 adapter and 3271 plates because 
> they match other heads I use, but the 3271 plates are a bit large, so 
> I used a Dremel tool to remove unnecessary parts and whittle it down 
> to Leica M size.
>

-- 
Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
(Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)



Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Portable tripods Suggestions - Bogen Manfrotto prefered)
In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Portable tripods Suggestions - Bogen Manfrotto prefered)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Portable tripods Suggestions - Bogen Manfrotto prefered)