Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What do you mean, "is it moral?" Are we all morally required to go to the scene of disasters to 'help?' Of course not. The photographer or reporter on a scene is doing far more to 'help,' by bringing the event, disaster, to the world's attention, than people sitting at home questioning the morality of photographing rather than 'helping.' ;-) On 2/11/06 9:54 AM, "Douglas Sharp" <douglas.sharp@gmx.de> wrote: > And to have the guts and detachment to get the picture, instead of > trying to help - is it moral? Probably not - Is it right? - Definitely, > otherwise would know so much less about where the real problems are > Douglas > > Craig Schroeder wrote: > >> >>>> >>>> >>>> Like I said , it's far more important to be where these events >>>> happen, otherwise you never have the opportunities to capture the >>>> pictures. >>>> >>> >>> I've always thought the phrase: "f8 and be there" summed this up rather >>> nicely. >>> >>> Emanuel >>> >>> >> At my age, it's, F-what and be where? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information