Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DMR mk II ?
From: pwerner at bluewin.ch (pwerner@bluewin.ch)
Date: Sun Feb 5 13:33:59 2006

Tina,

Why only 8x10? Couldn't it be a bit bigger?
Arent'you exaggerating a leetle bit?

Cheers
Peter

>-- Original-Nachricht --
>Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:50:36 -0500
>From: Tina Manley <images@infoave.net>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] DMR mk II ?
>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>
>
>At 12:04 AM 2/5/2006, you wrote:
>>BTW, I wonder why those crash- and burn- photographers who shoot
>>100 pictures at 3200 ISO to get a usable one are posting here at all.
>>Leica with its tradition of superior picture quality is not
>>and has never been the type of camera they need.
>>
>>Peter
>
>If you were concerned only with the superior picture quality and not 
>with the ability to tell a story using a small, unobtrusive camera, 
>you would be using large format 8x10 view cameras, not 35 mm.
>
>Tina
>
>Tina Manley, ASMP
>http://www.tinamanley.com  
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)