Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lens was tagged as 35/2 Nikkor. Priced at $500 (Can.). Lens was too small to my eyes to be a 35/2 and turned out to be a 35/3.5. Too expensive and too slow for what it is. Price was not reduced from $500 by the Dealer but '2' was crossed out when I was going out the door. Thanks, Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Durling <durling@cox.net> Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:04 pm Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: FMV for Nikkor 35/3.5 lens in LTM? > Getting to this a little late. I don't know about the 35/3.5, but > the > Nikkor 35/2.5 is an extraordinarily good lens. It was the first > lens I > got for a Leica, and I've never felt justified in getting another > 35. > Last I looked they were going for about $250, but that was a few > years ago. > > Mike D > > GREG LORENZO wrote: > > Any opinions from users on the Nikkor 35/3.5 lens in LTM? (I've > re-read Tom A's 35mm lens review already). > > > > Also, what is current fair market value for this lens in > Excellent+ condition? > > > > Regards, > > > > Greg > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >