Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan Wajsman (gentleman and scholar) wrote: > >A good photograph is a good photograph, and a poor photograph is a poor >photograph, regardless of the equipment. Yes, all of us came to this >list because we have an attachment to Leica, but the reason why other >brands have intruded on both the discussion and the imagery posted is >simply that Leica has not produced any significant innovations in the >past few years, except the DMR--and there has been a fair amount of >discussion of that. > >As for Leica images being of special interest because they are Leica >images, how would you regard a photograph shot with a Canon body and a >Leica lens? I say there are probably dozens of other on-line forums dedicated valuably to the art & technology of the visual image. None of them impinge the slightest upon my time because I am Leica photographer, and that's why I bothered to RSVP to this here party. Oh, and for the Scotch talk. Yeh. One can mix & match & graft all kinds of orphan waif childs via unnatural machinery acts and I still won't bite. Leica je suis. But, clearly, I am part of a rapidly shrinking (and sour) minority here. Emanuel