Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Mon Jan 16 22:47:59 2006
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20060114232020.0ab9def8@192.168.100.42> <43CC7ED1.4070009@planet.nl>

My prefered solution so far as well. Small domke satchel and the
the "Little Smaller" Domke  (F-6?) bag for more M stuff or my
D70 kit. Between the two, bag lust has gone down considerably :-)

Scott

Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
> I used to have one. It had some virtues, but ultimately I found it too 
> flimsy to hold 2 bodies and 3-4 lenses. I have since settled on the 
> small Domke satchels as the ideal vehicle for Leica M outfits and a 
> slightly larger Domke bag for my DSLR, with Lowe Pro bags used when 
> more protection is needed.
>
> Nathan
>
> Richard wrote:
>
>> I am thinking about ordering a M Classics bag. Seems like what I need 
>> - no bulky profile, easy to access, holds couple bodies. I won't be 
>> using it for general camera transportation, only when I am shooting 
>> so the lack of padding shouldn't matter. Any negative experience that 
>> I should know about?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
>> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>


Replies: Reply from summicron at bellsouth.net (Frank F. Farmer) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)