Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The reality, Bob, which was apparent before digital became such a topic of conversation here, is that you can say just so many things about a brick that exposes film. ;-) As to the lenses, what is there to say after you've said 'Spectacular!' in a dozen different languages? That's probably why we used to expend so much bandwidth on Scotch, motorcycles, cars, pens, and just about every other object fetish. At least the current digital discussions really do have something to do with photography, and photography is what Leica ownership is really all about, isn't it? On 1/16/06 4:28 PM, "Bob Haight" <rhaightjr@yahoo.com> wrote: > All this talk about film vs. digital is really > irrelevant to those who look to this list for > thoughts, examples and discourse on the use of Leica M > products. The regrettable reality that Leica Ms may no > longer be "main stream" hopefully will not prevent > those who do use Leica products from bantering about, > here, ideas and comments on Leica Ms. The forum topic > will always be of interest to those who partake. Once > the digital M comes out, and who knows when that will > be given the experience of DMR, the discourse will > then naturally involve digital imaging. But, to > compare or argue the advantages of a Canon DSLR over > my IIIg really makes no sense to me, since I elect to > use my Leica as is and talk about here. Bob Haight > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information