Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hasselbald now digital conflicted
From: SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com)
Date: Sat Jan 14 16:03:20 2006

In a message dated 1/14/2006 9:46:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
bruce@ralgo.nl writes:
Hi Sonny,

With what did you scan  it?

B.

This: 
http://www.microtekusa.com/smi900_specs.html


On  14-jan-2006, at 5:29, SonC@aol.com wrote:

>
>
> In a  message dated 1/13/2006 9:58:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>  images@InfoAve.Net writes:
>
> The  ability to send digital  files by
> e-mail or ftp instead of making dupes and  sending them  through the
> mail has revolutionized the way that  photographers do  business.
>
>
>
> Well, yes.  I still shoot  film.  because I have a  cheap, stable  
> way to
>  preserve the image for a long time.  It is a   negative.
>
> But then, I can, (and have) shot an assignment on  Sunday,  and  
> delivered the
> images via my server,  essentially on the art director's  desk  
> Monday  morning.
>
> Today I delivered a 688 meg image (scanned from an  8x10) to the  
> Louisiana
> State Museum for a mural  display.  The original was shot in 1978.   
> I  took  the
> 8x10 and scanned it today, then placed on the server.    They have  
> it, ready to
> make a mural.
>
>  Whew.  I am conflicted.


Regards,  
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
?galit?, libert?, crawfish
 


Replies: Reply from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] Hasselbald now digital conflicted)