Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Oh, there's nothing wrong with the Summitar, sorry if I implied it. I just happened to see these two on the negatives I was looking at. I like it because it can collapse. I used it all New Year's Eve wide-open and I don't have any complaints at all in those shots. But then again, I'm easy to please. I am childishly infatuated with the IIIf. Don't know why. Probably because I finally got one back after trading one in long, long ago so that I could buy Leica M's. Daniel On 1/6/06, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote: > I find it difficult to compare both since they're used in different > situations. > But the Summitar sure looks good. > > > > Op 6-jan-06, om 20:04 heeft Daniel Ridings het volgende geschreven: > > > These are just two shots I ran off to compare the Summitar and Elmar > > that I have for the IIIf. I already know that the Jupiter-8 is a > > top-class lens. I ran across a Summitar for a reasonable price (a tad > > over 100 USD) that was in near perfect condition, so I couldn't > > resist. > > > > Summitar > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/iiif/05v52_0001 > > > > Elmar > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/iiif/05v52_0002 > > > > Daniel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >