Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT or not: dilemma
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Sun Dec 18 07:49:26 2005
References: <001c01c603d5$36fc0040$0202a8c0@acer81080ea37f>

Steve ............ I wish to fit a M series of lenses to an EOS D5,  
D20 whatever. Douglas suggested Novoflex, but .................

B.
The Hague, The Netherlands

On 18-dec-2005, at 14:16, Steve Unsworth wrote:

> Bruce, yes the Summicron is an R lens - there's no way to fit an M  
> lens on
> an R body and retain infinity focus.
>
> Steve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On  
> Behalf Of
> bruce
> Sent: 18 December 2005 11:57
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT or not: dilemma
>
> Must I conclude that the 50mm Summicron is R? Does anyone know if  
> there is
> an adapter series for Leica M to EOS? CameraQuest have 42mm Pentax  
> screw
> adapters to EOS ........... but no 39mm bayonet or screw Leica to  
> EOS. It
> should be possible, certainly for the D20.
>
> B.
> The Hague, The Netherlands.
>
>
> On 18-dec-2005, at 12:06, Steve Unsworth wrote:
>
>>  I have a Tokina 28-80 'Pro' lens as a 'walk about' lens on my 5D.
>> This is
>> an f2.8 constant aperture lens. I also have a Canon 28mm f2.8 lens.
>> The
>> Canon prime is far, far, better than the zoom wide open and this  
>> shows
>> very clearly on the image.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On  
>> Behalf
>> Of Nathan Wajsman
>> Sent: 18 December 2005 07:19
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT or not: dilemma
>>
>>
>> Finally, I do not agree that lenses are becoming less important. I  
>> can
>> clearly see the difference on the screen between an inferior lens a
>> good one, and while some things can be fixed in PS, you cannot easily
>> fix things like distortion, colour fringing or chromatic aberration.
>> In fact, I can make the opposite argument: with digital and PS, I can
>> look at each image at 100%, which corresponds to a print size that is
>> way bigger than anything I have ever printed.
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date:  
> 16/12/2005
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] OT or not: dilemma)
In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] OT or not: dilemma)