Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet"
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Thu Nov 17 09:09:06 2005
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20051117004901.05ff9b68@192.168.100.42> <0e0fbb2891fd5d983ab9d4cd463b4a4c@ncable.net.au> <6.1.0.6.2.20051117014635.05758588@192.168.100.42> <AA455A7B-67E9-451C-8FC3-56701C2F62A5@pandora.be> <6.1.0.6.2.20051117024135.058b7fd0@192.168.100.42>
Richard said: "
Subject: Re: [Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet"
> May be I should just stop this cropping thing and go with my original
> "vision"
> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/tmp/img021x.jpg
> > Any merit now?<<<<
Aaaa gee whiz Richard, "going with your original vision?" I'd delete and
start over!"
Because it's one of those we see in real life but it just doent cut it when
it becomes a photograph. It's like trying to make a silk purse out of a
cow's arse!.
ted
Replies:
Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
In reply to:
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")