Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet"
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Thu Nov 17 02:35:11 2005
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20051117004901.05ff9b68@192.168.100.42> <0e0fbb2891fd5d983ab9d4cd463b4a4c@ncable.net.au> <6.1.0.6.2.20051117014635.05758588@192.168.100.42> <AA455A7B-67E9-451C-8FC3-56701C2F62A5@pandora.be>

May be I should just stop this cropping thing and go with my original 
"vision"
http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/tmp/img021x.jpg

Any merit now?

At 01:43 AM 11/17/2005, you wrote:

>Add the dog and you'll be there.
>
>Op 17-nov-05, om 10:48 heeft Richard het volgende geschreven:
>
>>OK, a bomb is a bomb :-) I re-cropped per your suggestion? Any
>>better? Do a shift-reload
>>http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/tmp/img021.jpg
>>
>>I am beginning to get the idea that my friends dress a little
>>different from you guys :-)
>>
>>At 01:37 AM 11/17/2005, Alastair Firkin wrote:
>>
>>>Nah from me again, but that is one hell of a nose ring that guy's
>>>got. If you were not worried about the posture or look of the
>>>"humans", I would have found it stronger to have left everything
>>>but their feet and the dog out.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>
>>// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
>>use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Another yay or nah? "Feet")