Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Sun Nov 13 07:35:32 2005
References: <BF9D14A7.7EC8%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>

I thought you meant TLR's because you said TLR.


> Sorry, wasn't meaning the 2 eyes but the pre 600x ones like the SL66.
> I should have specified that.
>
>
>
>> From: Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:20:36 -0600
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT:  bronica 645 RF?
>>
>> Rolleis are NOT big and heavy.   I have a Rolleicord IV with a Schneider
>> Xenar 75/3.5 lens that weighs 29 oz.   Even my 3.5F with Planar only 
>> weighs
>> 43 oz.
>>
>>
>>> And if you want to go big and heavy TLR, a lot of nice and relatively
>>> alternatives pop up: the Mamiya's, the Bronica's, the older Rolleis, and
>>> even Hassies.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)