Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]BD, Better means, of course, prints that I prefer. They are subjectively better. They might also be objectively better (finer detail that can be measured, a fuller range of the gray scale that can be measured, usw), but that is not what I am interested in. I am interested in how they look to me, and glossy fiberbase prints, airdried, have a look that I just love, and I have never produced, nor seen, an inkjet print that has anything like that look. Bob > Define "better." > > > On 11/9/05 10:38 AM, "Robert Meier" <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote: > >> Why? To make better prints. >> >> >> >>> Richard: >>> >>> I have a question about your darkroom plans. WHY? Adobe Photoshop and a >>> $300 dollar Epson 1280 would allow you to make better images. Darkrooms >>> are wet, smelly, expensive and sometimes caustic. Additionally, they are >>> a pain in the ass. >>> >>> It can be very relaxing to sit in front of your PC, dim the lights and >>> create. A little background Bach and a glass of wine, what more could >>> you want? >>> >>> Walt >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >