Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Erik and Ric and William for sharing your thoughts and suggestions. I've tried alternate crops (I appreciate the encouragement to make them) and I just am going with my original framing which matched my understanding at the moment I made the image. William, thanks for sharing the image with your friend. I do use R lenses with the 1Ds - the most common is the 100 APO but I also use the telyt 280/560 as well - they are my long lenses. The image was made late on a cloudy afternoon - the sun already below Boulder's mountains to the west, the sky overcast, thunder rippling and light rain falling. The girls were very active, flitting from place to place like so many butterflies - they had just come home from pre-school, were trilled to see their mother and father and then to have GUESTS! Who were staying for DINNER! Could it be better than that? I knew I wanted to isolate them as much as possible from the background so I chose the 70-200 instead of my 24-70 zoom. I think it was the best choice. My knees aren't that great so if something happened that I wasn't keeping up with I could zoom in a bit. So the 100 APO wasn't even considered. I do love the 100 APO and used it for this (previously posted) portrait of Maddy, our house sitter, my gift to her for her high school graduation: <http://www.adambridge.com/Photos/2005/05/21/TheHouseSitter.jpg> Gradually I'm getting better at using manual focus lenses and the new screen for the 1Ds viewfinder is making that easier. Adam On 11/5/05, William G. Lamb, III <lambroving@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > Hello Adam, > > Thanks for confirming my suspicions. :-) Was chatting last night on > Skype with a German friend, graphic designer and Leica, EOS and > Plaubel photographer. Had to show him this shot and let him guess. > Of course, I know you have 1Ds Mk II and this was my guess, but > he came to the same conclusion based on the DOF which is still > greater than film (to my eye) with this focal length. We also figured > somewhere between 135mm - 180mm. > > Knew it wasn't a Leica lens because I'm used to seeing the snaps > of a friend and retired press photographer in Washington D.C. who > uses this camera a lot with a 180/2. (Good thing he is short and has > a stocky build! :-) Don't quite know how he manages, but he shoots > snaps of his Bouviers moving at the speed of a runaway freight train! > <http://homepage.mac.com/billh96007/PhotoAlbum89.html> > Somehow I doubt your achievement required much less skill. :-) > > Have you tried your camera with any R lenses or do you need the > predictive AF? With some serious luck, I might have managed > something similar with my M7 and 75/2. Nah... Not a prayer with > such a cute, fast-moving subject. :-) > > Really enjoyed the framing of your shot. As my German friend > said, "It make me tilt my head!" :-) Whether accidental or not, it > adds a fresh and engaging dimension to this subject. May you > catch many more! > > Best Regards, > > William > > At 09:23 PM 11/4/2005 -0800, you wrote: > >On 11/4/05, William G. Lamb, III <lambroving@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > > > > > One of the cutest, most original and beautifully composed portraits > > > I've seen in a great while. Certainly glad you discovered it. > > > > > > Would you care to share the technical details? > > > > > ><http://www.adambridge.com/Photos/2005/11/04/_L3U5959.jpg> > > > >This was shot with the 1Ds Mkii, 70-200mm f2.8L lens, ISO 800, 1/640th > >@ f2.8, 165mm > > > >I'm not quick enough yet to use the Leica 100mm APO for photographing > >active children although I'm learning and the new focusing screen > >really helps also. > > > >Thanks for asking, sorry there wasn't Leica content. > > > >Adam > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >