Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 10/30/2005 5:30:52 A.M. Central Standard Time, kididdoc@cox.net writes: _http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88484.html_ (http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88484.html) if Sonny wants to show in Friday flowers, a flower on a coffee mug, or a jet fighter.... I will look and not complain... Of course, and I have even shown them in a flower bed. _http://www.sonc.com/flower_bed.htm_ (http://www.sonc.com/flower_bed.htm) But the context in a set need not be explained. Had there been one more shot of someone ignoring the camera, that might have change everything in my mind. The context of the set was several people looking right at the lens and one not. I'm not complaining, I just think the set would be stronger without him. Not only the eyes, bot the entire composition of 85 seems at odds with the others. More than mere dissonance. Regards, Sonny http://www.sonc.com Natchitoches, Louisiana Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane ?galit?, libert?, crawfish