Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: [LRflex] Re: eyes...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat Oct 29 17:31:09 2005
References: <54145881-51C8-4C78-9DA3-669CD83B0C0C@cox.net> <B6B5142B-564D-4453-8207-E1C13AD6C15D@cox.net> <000d01c5dcac$b9dc10e0$1ae76c18@ted>

On Oct 29, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Ted Grant wrote:

> Steve Barbour showed:
> Subject: [LRflex] eyes...
>
>
>
>>> a few images taken yesterday...over an hour...
>>> http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88482.html
>>> http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88483.html
>>> http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88484.html
>>> http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88485.html
>>> http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88486.html
>>>
>
> Hi Steve,
> Shooting eyes is probably one of the most difficult subjects to hit  
> and make
> absolutely riveting pictures because they have to be as sharp as  
> all get
> out! I mean sharper than sharp!
>
> And if they aren't, they just don't cut it.
>
> You have a couple that work and some that don't! Maybe a tighter  
> edit on the
> basis of "if in doubt, out!!"  Simply because any doubt whatsoever  
> it's
> obvious the shot isn't sharp enough.
>
> It doesn't matter what lens because if you focus right on the eyes  
> with
> Leica glass you should cut your fingers on eye reflections! :-)


you are right Ted... I am trying a new idea... so later more, and  
sharper...thanks, Steve

In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] eyes...)