Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 4:04 PM +0200 10/19/05, F?lix L?pez de Maturana wrote: >>Ted: >> >>Take a look at wide shots from the 5D. All the >>image is smeared looking other than the central >>portion. I have seen this both with the fine >>Canon L wides and the finest of the Leica >>wides. If you ever heard the expression "If it >>looks too good to be true?" The 1Ds MK II >>doesn't seem to suffer from this problem with >>the wides. >> >>Regards, > >Ted > > >I'm just shooting right now with 5D and 14mm >f2.8, 16-35mm f2.8 and 24-105mm f4. It's too >early for having complete conclusions but >saying that "all the image is smeared...other >than central portion" is merely an exaggeration, >and I'm a user of Leica R with 21-35mm zoom and >Leica M with 21mm lenses. You have shot many, >many pictures with your -excellent- Canon 20D, >just give the 5D an opportunity! There are some >important members of the LUG -I don't need >mentioning them- who started shooting with >digital Canon "and" Leica lenses. Good match. >But I'm watching that, more and more, they are >actually using right now Canon lenses too. > >Regards > >Felix The images from the 5D that I shot show a very high image quality, and you can shoot as wide as 12mm, and you can get the shallow depth of field that an 85/1.2, with attendant field of view will produce, all from a body that is quite compact and handles well. On top of that the low light capability and quality is unmatched at this time. It's not the best choice for Leica-R wideangles, but it does things that you can't do with the DMR, or the 20D, or with a 22mp MF back, or a 141mp non-Bayer Betterlight scanning back, and for a price that can't get you a 1Ds. It has its place, and I feel is an incredibly good value at this point. I'm delighted that Leica has produced a digital solution that produces, within certain parameters, images of a quality that can compete with the best other 35mm based solutions, but it is a compromise as are all cameras. I hope that it succeeds, because Leica depends on it and I want to see the Digital-M produced, and I want Leica to stay in business to make more high quality products. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com