Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don - Photography is so much about arresting motion that it very idea of exposing for such a long time as an hour seems anachronistic. It takes us back to the days of Daguerre and Talbot. I'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with. >Richard, >Thank you for looking and taking time to comment. I was using a shutter >speed between 2 and 8 seconds. There is a photographer who has had a >profound influence on me when it comes to water shots who uses speeds closer >to an hour. Most water shots at between 1/4 and 1 second are a little too >literal. Next stop will be a 5 to 10 stop ND filter so that I can shoot >really long exposures of the world. > Don >don.dory@gmail.com > > On 10/11/05, Richard S. Taylor <r.s.taylor@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> Don - These two really work for me. What ever shutter speed you were >> using in the first it was just right to capture the differing speeds >> of the water flow in different parts of the picture. >> >> (snip) >> >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album255/widerockshot >> > Fourth, I can't resist shots of lone rocks in the water: >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album255/lonerock >> > >> >> In this one, I can't quite figure out what I'm looking at so I >> suppose it succeeds at being enigmatic, but I suspect you were going >> for something more. >> >> >Last, a somewhat enigmatic image. I shot it from above, but I find the >> >perspective a little disturbing. I would like to know what others think. >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album255/waterfallverticleII >> > Enjoy your weekend, comment as desired, give what aid and thoughts you >> can >> >to the victims of the earthquake near Kashmir. >> > Don >> >don.dory@gmail.com >> > >> Thanks for the look. > > -- > > -- Regards, Dick Boston MA