Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DMR at 1600 iso
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Fri Sep 30 14:20:24 2005
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20050930105226.0489ca20@mail.robsteve.com><BF62BF9F.6041%bdcolen@comcast.net><6.2.3.4.2.20050930132416.048ae470@mail.robsteve.com><007901c5c5dd$ee164b90$6101a8c0@jimnichols> <6.2.3.4.2.20050930143351.048ac310@mail.robsteve.com>

Robert,

I did not state my guess at the cameras used, but chose the Leica DMR 
results as "best", in my opinion.  Congratulations on presenting a blind 
comparison, which, to me, shows the DMR to produce realistic results.  The 
other photo has a "glow", but it looks contrived.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA 



Replies: Reply from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
In reply to: Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)
Message from leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens) ([Leica] DMR at 1600 iso)