Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This might be the wrong crowd to be asking this question, but here goes. My workplace has banned cameras completely. If I want to shoot at lunch or on the way home, I must leave the camera in my car in the underground parking garage. I am not comfortable with leaving a Leica in my car. So I was thinking of applying the Daniel Ridings Solution: Use a Soviet camera as my "at-risk" camera. My recent shooting with my Zorki 4 and Jupiter-8 have left me underwhelmed at the J-8. It's an OK lens, but it's very flare-prone, low contrast and a bit soft at the 3 widest stops . Even at narrow apertures, it's no Summicron. At f/4.5 and wider, it's distinctly 1930s. In general, I consider it good for retro portraits, but not up to par for general use. Seattle has many cloudy days when I'd need to open up. I also have an Industar 61 L/D 55/2.8, which is supposed to be the Soviet equivalent of the Red Scale Elmar. Basically a Tessar lens, with lanthanum glass. This lens has an outstanding reputation. Mine focuses significantly to the rear of where the RF says it is on the Zorki. So I don't know yet how good or bad it really is. I'm thinking seriously of trying to get the Industar 61 adjusted. But I'm wondering whether I should do this with a $12 lens, or simply buy a couple more until I get one that works. Or try for a better Jupiter-8. I'm also wondering whether I should stop playing Russian roulette, buy a used Bessa R and C/V 35 or 50 for a couple of hundred dollars and stop worrying. I must admit to a slight fascination with the Zorki, but I much prefer shooting with a Leica. Buying more film cameras would cut into the "Someday a Digital Rangefinder" fund. Thoughts, advice? --Peter