Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG DMR
From: leica at robsteve.com (Robert Stevens)
Date: Thu Sep 22 11:41:49 2005
References: <200509220618.j8M67a6i070352@server1.waverley.reid.org> <4332F49B.6000201@telefonica.net>

Felix:

You need to take the batteries into account.  You need batteries in 
them for them to work.  I took my wife's kitchen scale and weighed 
each of them, in the case of the EOS, it was a 1D MK II.  I assume 
the 1Ds Mk II and 1D Mk II are similar in weight.

The R9 DMR, was about 1.39 kg.

The EOS 1D Mk II was 1.6 kg.

On the pricing, you are missing the rebates on the Leica, and I don't 
think B&H has the cheapest price on them.


Regards,

Robert

At 03:14 PM 9/22/2005, F?lix L?pez de Maturana wrote:

>>Aram:
>>
>>It weighs less than an EOS 1Ds MkII, and costs less too.
>>
>>Robert
>
>
>
>Unless I am wrong
>
>R9+DMR.......1.395 grams......$ 8.795 (BH)
>EOS 1Ds MkII........1.215grams........$7.395(BH)
>Nikon D2X...........1.252 grams........$4.995(BH)
>
>Felix
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release Date: 9/20/2005


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release Date: 9/20/2005



Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: LUG DMR)
Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: LUG DMR)
In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: LUG DMR)