Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: A few thoughts
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Mon Sep 5 00:05:28 2005
References: <61BF9680-EB45-4C35-8E31-C6A3B94DE3E8@earthlink.net> <4319F2FF.135E70DD@earthlink.net> <BA01C62C-3F9E-4433-AEBC-BDD84643E913@earthlink.net> <20050905055153.27903.qmail@balhpl01.ncable.net.au>

Not a bad point. But I don't know. Surveying the sensor landscape,
APS-C is an available and just as good (perhaps, better) candidate.

Who is making the 4/3 sensors? How aggressive is the R&D and
stable the supply vs. the APS-C sensors?  I imagine Nikon's voracious
demand will keep the supply of APS-C sensor supply and R&D
flowing.

Canon's recent announcement is promising for a "FF" sensor, but
I don't know that reliable supply will extend beyond Canon's bodies.
Good for high ISO performance. Is Kodak's R&D (including driving
up yield and down per-chip price) anywhere near Canon's?  Don't
really know.  Kodak is a huge company and might be up to the task
if they see a future market worthy of pursuit.

The workstation/pc "chip wars" were so insanely well documented
and at times I followed them closely (RISC/CISC, super scalar,
AMD vs. Intel architecture, and so on).  The "sensor wars" are
relatively opaque to me. I'd love to find a web site that provided
reliable, up to date information.  Are there even standard benchmarks
for sensors?

Scott

firkin wrote:

> Isn't Leica going with 4/3 like deciding to use 35mm film back in the 
> 1930's: as the chip/software improves, the need for the big chip may 
> not be there for Leica type photography?
> feli writes:
>
>>
>> On Sep 3, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Stephen Gandy wrote:
>>
>>> Well thought out!
>>> yes, let the chips fall where they will.
>>> on your 4/3 question, there is a rumor Leica will have a digital 4/3
>>> camera, a version of the yet to be announced Panasonic 4/3.  Time will
>>> tell.
>>
>>
>> Well, I hope Leica doesn't go 4/3. I think it's a dead end, given 
>> how  tiny the chip is.
>> If Leica wants to make some glass for Panasonic to rake in some cash  
>> that's another
>> story.
>> I think Minolta is being very clever. They are using the same chip 
>> as  is in the D100.
>> But their built in Anti-shake technology buys them a good two stops  
>> of speed. So they
>> can shoot at 400asa, when everyone else without stabilization is at  
>> 1600asa.
>>
>> Feli
>>
>> ________________________________________________________
>> feli2@earthlink.net                 2 + 2 = 4                
>> www.elanphotos.com
>>
>> NO ARCHIVE
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> Alastair Firkin
> www.afirkin.com
> www.familyofman2.com
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re: A few thoughts)
In reply to: Message from leicanikon at earthlink.net (Stephen Gandy) ([Leica] A few thoughts)
Message from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: A few thoughts)