Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard Coutant wrote: > Somehow I managed to accidentally delete and send the last message all > at once...What I was saying was that earlier tonight I was asked to look > at a bag of Leica stuff that my friend Arthur had inherited - a IIIa > number 261667 261667 is a 1937 IIIa. in pristine condition, with absolutely sweet shutter, even > the 1 sec humming along, and an Elmar in much different condition than > the camera, tarnished, pitted, peeling but good glass - an older one > with the 3.5/4.5/6.3/9/12.5/18 apertures. As best as I could see with a > magnifier the lens number is 124167. 124167 would be a pre-'30 lens, if I read the tables correctly. Hove says: "From 1931 in standardised ("O") version many different versions before and during wartime. European aperture scale, last version international scale. Some versions with finer spacing of focussing scale." I told him that the only > explanation I could think of was that the lens was a later wartime or > postwar item with the finish problems typical of that era. I have no > lens number resources - does anybody know how old this is? In the bag > was also a 9cm/f4 Elmar number 165147 165147 would seem to be about 1933 (Hove 7th edition p272). in perfect condition with both > front and rear metal caps, and an E. Leitz New York complete illustrated > price list from March 1939. Along with a bunch of Kodak filters and an > Argus brochure(!) What a pretty set. I told him to buy some film. > Do others agree with the above? Absolutely agree, these are still usable cameras and live if they are used. Peter Dzwig