Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks > From: mehrdad <msadat@gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:19:26 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII > > this is only for opening raw files in c1 and using the etc profiles > rather the the generic c1 profiles. > > On 9/2/05, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote: >> Is that the same as the built in RAW conversion for different cameras of >> PS >> CS? Or is it rather as attributing a color profile when opening the new >> file >> converted from RAW in PS CS? Or is this just an additional function in >> Capture One? I never worked with the latter myself, that's why I ask. >> >> >>> From: mehrdad <msadat@gmail.com> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >>> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:52:05 -0700 >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII >>> >>> this company has created specific profiles to use with capture one >>> software (c1). these are specific profiles for a particular camera, >>> the theory behind it is just like using a paper profile for a desk jet >>> printers. i use profiles for my printing all the time and it makes a >>> big difference, though i have not used anything for digi cameras >>> >>> On 9/2/05, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote: >>>> Somewhere they're talking about changing the camera profile (they refer >>>> to >>>> http://etcetera.cc/pub/index.php/article/frontpage/1). What do they mean >>>> with that? Can anybody explain this (a bit) plz? >>>> >>>> >>>>> From: Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> >>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >>>>> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 17:56:38 -0400 >>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII >>>>> >>>>> sorry if this is a repeat, but have you seen the LONG thread over on >>>>> fredmiranda.com <http://fredmiranda.com>? >>>>> >>>>> spend a few hours reading it.. >>>>> http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/267995/0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Eric >>>>> >>>>> On 9/2/05, F?lix L?pez de Maturana <FELIXMATURANA@telefonica.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> This is the most comprehensive test but not scientific at all I've >>>>>> read >>>>>> up to now. Just a small problem : it's in Spanish >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> http://www.macuarium.com/cms/macu/pruebas/el-modulo-digital-r-de-leica.htm>>>>> l >>>>>> >>>>>> Felix >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------------- >>> regards, mehrdad >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > -- > ------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >