Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]According the Paul Roark (a very helpful fellow, BTW; he designs most of the MIS B&W inksets pro-bono), PrintShield decreases the dMax of matte prints. I don't have a densitometer to verify this myself. Lascaux fixative is apparently very neutral, and an old standby of charcoal and pastel artists. I have a couple of matte prints I'm thinking of trying PrintShield on this evening. I'm curious if any lack of dMax is evident (subjectively)when mounted under glass. The UV protection of PrintShield is certainly a big plus! Scott mehrdad wrote: >Scott, i use PrintShield for both glossy and matte, what more does >fixative do for matte than PrintShield > >On 9/1/05, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote: > > >>While glued to CNN, I've been catching up on spraying some >>of my recent prints before framing them or sticking them in an >>album. >> >>I've been using Lascaux Fixative on my matte prints and PrintShield >>on glossy prints. >> >>Any other folks using other products on matte and/or glossy prints? >>Any costs/benefits for using other coatings? >> >>I've been using this little formula base on the recommendations >>of Paul Roark on the B&W Digi Printing Yahoo forum, so I'd >>appreciate other folks' feedback, experiences and the like. >> >>BTW, I don't sell prints, so expensive laminate processes are out >>of my reach at the current time. >> >>Scott >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> > > > >