Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> That brings us back once again to the suggestion that if Leica is to have a > future, that future probably lies in producing lenses in Canon and Nikon > mounts, or selling Leica lenses with red dotted Canon and Nikon adapters, > rather than wasting money on trying to produce digital backs for a tiny > handful of diehard fans. B.D. - I have no idea what the future of Leica, Leaf, Imacon, Sinar, or any other 'high-end' camera/digital/back mfg's may be. Apparently they're all shuffling to figure it out. They all have small niche markets to figure out. Comparing them with Nikon and Canon makes very little sense. The Sinar M camera can take lenses from anyone. Sinar doesn't make lenses. Sinar used to make view cameras. Then digital backs (sort of) and now a multiformat camera body. Leaf back folks freaked out last week because Kodak bought a bunch of Scitex and the 'Leaf niche' wants nothing to do with Kodak tech support. and on and on and on. I, for one, love the idea of 'digital backs' - rentable, upgradeable and adaptable to existing systems. So do medium format shooters. Leaf, Imacon, PhaseOne, Sinar, and Mega-Vision backs all cost 2 to 5 times more than Leica's back. They're all 'pro niche market' items. They're tools that may or may not work for you. They have nothing to do with 'die-hard' brand loyalty. Your constant background drone of what sounds like anti-leica mantras really does little to help our understanding of what is going on technically - be it optical, digital, mechanical, electronic or otherwise. -- regards, George Lottermoser, imagist