Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 217
From: gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO)
Date: Thu Aug 11 20:38:10 2005
 
Doug Herr writes:

> 
> so B.D. is willing to claim the 180 ED is at least as good as the 180 APO,
> despite never having used the APO.  I haven't given the 180 ED a 
> decentworkout or test yet, and I haven't used the 180 f/2.8 APO so 
> I'll reserve judgement until I can make an objective comparison. Meanwhile 
> for 
> $159 I won't complain about the ED lens.
> 

But of course he is. What's the use of having an Ouija Board if you never 
actually *use* it!

Regards,

Greg
Replies: Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) (180: APO or ED? (was Re: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 217))