Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]God I never thought I'd end up defending wet prints...but Walt, the suggestion that " Adobe Photoshop, Nikon Coolscan and a good Epson printer( in the right hands) can blow away most wet prints" is complete and utter nonsense, assuming you're referring to wet printing "in the right hands." Digital printing is digital printing, whether using the OEM inks, or systems such as the Cone quadtones, or MIS inks. And silver printing is silver printing. Both will, in the hands of a competent printer, produce gorgeous results. But neither will be 'better' than the other. Now, if you want to say that a competent digital printer can more quickly produce, and infinitely more quickly reproduce a print than even the best wet printer, you're absolutely correct. :-) B. D. On 8/11/05 1:58 PM, "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote: > Bill: > > You can certainly scan you b&w negative and print on an inkjet with good > results. As a matter of fact, a few simple tools can insure better results > than a Focomat V35. > > Adobe Photoshop, Nikon Coolscan and a good Epson printer( in the right > hands) > can blow away most wet prints. Most importantly, the results are > repeatable. > > There are some very good links on the subject and one of the best is > Clayton > Jones. http://www.cjcom.net/articles/digiprn1.htm > > > Walt J. > walt@waltjohnson.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information