Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Steve: the only time I've used Ilford film, I've found it to be excellent, but its not "easy" to get here, so I tended to stick with the yellow boxes: As for the cricket: its all tooooo predicable eh ;-) On 23/07/2005, at 7:43 PM, Steve Unsworth wrote: > Try a few rolls of FP4, I don't think you'll be disappointed. > > Interesting couple of days in the cricket :-) > > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf > Of Alastair Firkin > Sent: 23 July 2005 04:29 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film > dinosuars donow? > > > > On 22/07/2005, at 1:20 AM, Don Dory wrote: > > > funny, only today I was talking with Helen about where I might get b/w > film in the future and came down on Ilford for just these reasons. I > have not used Ilford film much and so now is a good time to change. > Fuji b/w does not make it big in Oz and Efke is still obscure. Kodak > will I think have trouble justifying film if they cannot justify paper. > > Cheers > Alastair > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date: > 22/07/2005 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Alastair