Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Nikon glass?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Sun Jul 24 01:46:17 2005

1964....... or was it 1960?

105 ( non macro) is a classic Portrait lens ( ask Mark Rabiner) , the long
lenses will duplicate to some extent the Telyt 280/400/560/640/800
setup..... but they are cheaper and I think they are 3 glass elements so
they should be as contrasty....and may be faster than F5.6 .....

I had an old Nikkor 800 that was truly scary in size.  Never shot the lens
( owned it for about 45minutes....)

Any old non retro focus lens that had 3 elements or less would be truly
incredible for sports or animal photography.

Then there were the Nikkor 500 and 800 and 1000mm Mirror lenses. the MTO (
Russian ) mirrors......  that all were good, but had their own issues with
being mirror designs...

Then there is the famous 43-86 zoom.... that was always considered a woof
woof.... but may have enough Bokeh to kill for.....

Speaking of Bokeh, have you tried the 58 Nikkor Nocti?  that might be
fun.....

What are you trying to shoot?  Birds, sports ( your kids are a bit young for
this yet, but you could use the practice), or animals ?  You seem pretty
"correct" so I would assume your neighbors is not one of the targets......

Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net

. All I
know about Nikon lenses is that the mount has not changed since before I
was born or something like that.

Are there any Nikon lenses out there
that are really good, as in worth buying to use on my Canon 20D? I am
only interested in primes.



Replies: Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: Nikon glass?)
In reply to: Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: Nikon glass?)